APA
Click to copy
EdwardMorey, Waldman, D., Assane, D. D., & Shaw, D. W. (1995). Searching for a Model of Multiple-Site Recreation Demand that Admits Interior and Boundary Solutions. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 77(1), 129–140. https://doi.org/https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2307/1243895
Chicago/Turabian
Click to copy
EdwardMorey, Donald Waldman, Djeto D. Assane, and Douglass W. Shaw. “Searching for a Model of Multiple-Site Recreation Demand That Admits Interior and Boundary Solutions.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 77, no. 1 (1995): 129–140.
MLA
Click to copy
EdwardMorey, et al. “Searching for a Model of Multiple-Site Recreation Demand That Admits Interior and Boundary Solutions.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 77, no. 1, 1995, pp. 129–40, doi:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2307/1243895.
BibTeX Click to copy
@article{edwardmorey1995a,
title = {Searching for a Model of Multiple-Site Recreation Demand that Admits Interior and Boundary Solutions},
year = {1995},
issue = {1},
journal = {American Journal of Agricultural Economics},
pages = {129-140},
volume = {77},
doi = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2307/1243895},
author = {EdwardMorey and Waldman, Donald and Assane, Djeto D. and Shaw, Douglass W.}
}
For most recreation demand data sets, different individuals visit different subsets of the available sites. Interior solutions (i.e, individuals who visit all recreational sites) are not the norm. Boundary solutions (i.e., individuals who do not participate, or who visit some, but not all, of the sites) predominate. We critique eight demand models in terms of their ability to accommodate boundary solutions. Three models are recommended for consideration when there are multiple sites and the data set includes a significant number of boundary solutions: a repeated nested-logit model, a multinomial share model, and a Kuhn-Tucker model.
