Using Angler Characteristics and Attitudinal Data to Identify Environmental Preference Classes: A Latent-Class Model


Journal article


Edward R. Morey, Jennifer Thacher, William S. Breffle
Environmental and Resource Economics, vol. 34(1), 2006, pp. 91-115

DOI: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10640-005-3794-7

Semantic Scholar DOI
Cite

Cite

APA   Click to copy
Morey, E. R., Thacher, J., & Breffle, W. S. (2006). Using Angler Characteristics and Attitudinal Data to Identify Environmental Preference Classes: A Latent-Class Model. Environmental and Resource Economics, 34(1), 91–115. https://doi.org/https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10640-005-3794-7


Chicago/Turabian   Click to copy
Morey, Edward R., Jennifer Thacher, and William S. Breffle. “Using Angler Characteristics and Attitudinal Data to Identify Environmental Preference Classes: A Latent-Class Model.” Environmental and Resource Economics 34, no. 1 (2006): 91–115.


MLA   Click to copy
Morey, Edward R., et al. “Using Angler Characteristics and Attitudinal Data to Identify Environmental Preference Classes: A Latent-Class Model.” Environmental and Resource Economics, vol. 34, no. 1, 2006, pp. 91–115, doi:https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10640-005-3794-7.


BibTeX   Click to copy

@article{edward2006a,
  title = {Using Angler Characteristics and Attitudinal Data to Identify Environmental Preference Classes: A Latent-Class Model},
  year = {2006},
  issue = {1},
  journal = {Environmental and Resource Economics},
  pages = {91-115},
  volume = {34},
  doi = {https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10640-005-3794-7},
  author = {Morey, Edward R. and Thacher, Jennifer and Breffle, William S.}
}

Abstract. A latent-class model of environmental preference groups is developed and estimated with only the answers to a set of attitudinal questions. Economists do not typically use this type of data in estimation. Group membership is latent/unobserved. The intent is to identify and characterize heterogeneity in the preferences for environmental amenities in terms of a small number of preference groups. The application is to preferences over the fishing characteristics of Green Bay. Anglers answered a number of attitudinal questions, including the importance of boat fees, species catch rates, and fish consumption advisories on site choice. The results suggest that Green Bay anglers separate into a small number of distinct classes with varying preferences and willingness to pay for a PCB-free Green Bay. The probability that an angler belongs to each class is estimated as function of observable characteristics of the individual. Estimation is with the expectation–maximization (E–M) algorithm, a technique new to environmental economics that can be used to do maximum-likelihood estimation with incomplete information. As explained, a latent-class model estimated with attitudinal data can be melded with a latent-class choice model.
Keywords: attitudinal data, E–M algorithm, latent-class attitudinal model, latent-class joint model




Follow this website


You need to create an Owlstown account to follow this website.


Sign up

Already an Owlstown member?

Log in